This has new additions to it and some corrections. I may have missed some. I rarely sleep much and I am very tired, angry and frustrated.
(I am going to send this to a judge)
Please look at this case clearly and logically. Nothing makes sense.
I am being reviled and treated worse than known murderers. Why?
Judge Novak completely eviscerated me, based on what, my having given thank you gifts to my doctor? Those he wrote thank you emails for and called to thank me?
They added in some absurd little salacious bit to the TRO they served me, supposedly from Dr. L (it wasn't) to make it seem desperate, yet they waited 97 days AFTER I dropped Dr. L as my physician, so that we could start on a path to being friends, yet ONLY one week after he attended my surgery, at MY request! What would strike you as being the REAL REASON FOR THE TRO? Gifts, or the surgery attendance at my request? Going on the assumption that it was the surgery, then who was REALLY being punished? Me, or Dr. L?
They built a wall around Dr. L’s office to make it appear he was in danger...from who? Me? They know, from my lie detection and my will and my sending him my powers of attorney that MY life is in HIS hands, not the other way around.
If I were a threat to him, why not have me arrested? Why wait over three months while this “dangerous” gift giver roamed free to give me a TRO, which is meant for protection from immediate dangerous situations?
How correct/legal is it to foist an unwanted attorney on me, one who pretended to be with the Private Defender Program? Who paid him both times he babysat me and did nothing to help me? (But did plenty to HARM me!)
Why did they forge Dr. L’s signature...many times? Lie about his appearance in court, when he was not present?
Mr. Guasco possibly had forged Judge Chou’s signature as it appears to me from my experience of seeing the forger’s work. If that happened, what are the implications? Wouldn’t it have to mean that he conspired with Mr. Guasco, et al? Isn’t it worth checking into that serious possibility?
Why did judge Chou accept Mr. Guasco’s false evidence, that was supposedly in the binders? That was upon which the entire TWO YEAR extension to the restraining order was based. I DID NOT get a copy of those emails he said were written in 2017, just prior to my going to jail. (Why would I be violating so blatantly the R.O. when I was under a microscope, plus I had been told my access to Dr. L's email had been removed?
My ENTIRE online Kaiser account had/has been removed from my access, claiming I had abused it. I tried many times to get it re-instated, but it was always denied. If I had managed to write even one email to Dr. L in 2017, it would have set off so many warning alarms, I would have been pounced on in a second by Mr. Guasco. Why would Mr. Guasco allow me so much free time to write to Dr. L when he (Guasco) is obviously threatened by communication? He has made up many false accusations against me, I seriously doubt he would have waited for me to write 163 right under his nose. (Believe me, Mr. Guasco KNOWS EVERYTHING that goes on at Kaiser South San Francisco!) He puts his OWN people in strategic places at Kaiser, to help with his plans. He relies heavily on security guards and other Kaiser employees. Then, with the security guards, he gets them permanent jobs there at Kaiser, instead of them staying as contract worker, as in the job of security guard. I suppose it is to repay them for their part in railroading innocent targeted Kaiser patients, etc.
Mr. Guasco said that the false evidence emails he was using as his evidence to extend the false restraining order numbered 163, a distinctive number. That is the number of emails I was told I wrote in 2016 regarding a different matter, but one that was constructed for this very purpose: to be used as false evidence later on. He did by not follow rules of discovery. I never got a copy of the "evidence." Mr. Guasco said he could use those same emails as future evidence to keep me restrained forever. He was lying about everything he said, but Judge Chou assisted him in his lie, by letting him get away with it all. Guasco said he could give me 163 contempt charges if he wanted. He falsified evidence and then to attempt to give it gravitas, added in the bit about 163 contempt charges to make me feel how, "lucky" I was to be blessed by his "benevolence!" Guasco should be up for sainthood, yeah he and Charles Manson.
Mr. Guasco has made the court and Kaiser his playground of corruption!
Judge Chou never questioned the fact that Dr. L was not present, yet Guasco's paperwork claimed he had been there. Mr. Guasco lied. (Not a first!)
Why all the lies and covert behavior? Why the cruel taunts, derision, torment....especially from a judge?
How correct is it for a judge (Novak) to have an attorney she foisted off on me, clear the courtroom, just to have me verbally bludgeoned until I was a quivering mass of human flesh, who passed out for a moment from sheer terror?
Why were the only attorneys I was allowed/forced to have, obviously working not for me, but the other side?
They just told me to be quiet and yelled at me. It was not good for my MS.
How is throwing someone into jail to avoid the DA’s involvement correct procedure?
Why does it seem that Mr. Guasco and his sidekick, Marija M. Petrovic have some kind power/sway with the court? Even your last letter to me had her influence in the tone.
This entire matter is too strange and has too many unanswered questions. Something is VERY wrong!
Why would you say that the terrible things Judge Novak did to me, were fine?
Has the court been infiltrated by subversive types? The acceptance of wrongdoing as normal sets off a big red flag. What is going on? You cannot say any of this is normal. Even the attorneys who worked for the other side seemed freaked out. They sounded like they were doing it against their will. You seem that way too. I know I am suspicious, but when I am nearly always told that black is white in this case, it sets off my red flags and internal “bullshit meter”. The people involved in this act like hostages, not normal participants.(Even Dr. L wasV ODD behaving in court, like he had been drugged.) Nothing in this has been normal, or correct. What is going on? Is it because of Kaiser? They always answered my complaints the same way you did about Judge Novak...a blanket denial.
It seems like you need to contact the FBI, or top agencies about this. Everything done in this case has violated law and Judicial procedure. It needs investigating.
I never did anything wrong, yet the Kaiser attorneys are using me as a distraction and a scapegoat. Why? It needs to be stopped. I am suffering. I should not have this. It is ALL FALSE! I can prove it A-Z. The most incontrovertible proof are the attorneys: Mr. Bloom, Mr. Smith. Mr. Bloom was my hire after he contacted me. He dropped me after I spoke up in court and Judge Livermore replied that it was “very likely an invalid restraining order.” Mr. Guasco quickly faked up contempt charges during the time away from court and had Judge Livermore exclaim, “This is now a criminal matter!” The DA’s office told me that what Judge Livermore had said was untrue; that the DA pronounces criminal matters, not the judge. Yet, out popped Charlie Smith as if he had been waiting in the wings for his cue and handed me a green slip of paper from the Private Defender Program. Then later, “somehow” he glued himself to me as my attorney. The Private Defender Program did not have him listed, and neither was I. It was all a LIE! Who paid him? The judges were obviously paid for all their performances, why and by whom?
Was it deep pocket Kaiser? I know they have been restraining me for someone else, not Dr. L. It is the REAL client of Mike Guasco of Kaiser hired law firm of Buty and Curliano. Kaiser wants their other doctor, the real client, to be happy and by my giving her other income, in the person of Dr. L, gifts, must have felt threatening to her, but doing this to make life easier for herself at my expense, is illegal. Mr. Guasco should have turned it down, but Mr. Guasco was married to a drug dealer and was twice arrested himself, so I doubt if unethical is a word that has much impact on him.
Mr. Guasco behaves like a dirty fighting street thug, not an attorney. He has only the rudiments of legal behavior sprinkled with a liberal dose of LIES, CORRUPTION and RISK, so that he can assure himself a win. Had he not marginalized me with fake attorneys and monitoring my attorney interviews, which is how he got my court file he claimed was delivered to him by “someone.” Why would someone I was interviewing, who wanted to keep my file, after the first time I met him, send it to Mr. Guasco, then claim to have shredded it? He, Mr. Pelta, became, no exaggeration, hysterical, when I accused him of sending my file to Mr. Guasco. He even cried.
So, obviously, Mr. Guasco has been using covert methods to keep me under his thumb and to somehow keep me from being able to hire an attorney. When I asked him if he were keeping me from getting an attorney, Mr. Guasco merely smiled at me.
My question: why would Kaiser force their employee, a doctor, to do what THEY wanted him to do and not allow him to have his own mind and be autonomous? Using shady attorneys and beating up on an innocent senior, handicapped woman is not a good advertisement for a healthcare providing organization. They have gone to extreme methods to keep me away. I hope that because of all the forgeries of Dr. L’s signature, that they have not gotten any ideas of completely stealing his identity and then getting rid of him. (The same language as the security guard said about me. He said, “Marija Petrovic was specifically hired to get rid of you!”) From the treatment I have endured by their associates, I know that term, “rid” is left up to loose interpretation. Could be permanent.
Attorney Moira Hogan said, “These are very, very bad people….stay away from them!” Oh, that I could! They are cold blooded, and devious. It scares the shit out of me for Dr. L’s safety.
He needs to be protected and checked upon periodically. It would let the predators know he is not alone. He may already be held as a prisoner and being tormented.
No comments:
Post a Comment