400 County Center
Redwood City, CA 94063
In RE: People v. Petrovich
Dear DA Wagstaffe,
I hope this finds you very well and safe.
In the matter of The People v. Petrovich, It was an invalid restraining order from the beginning, manufactured against me by Kaiser Contract Attorney, Michael C. Guasco, using lies and forgery, threat and duress.
I would please ask that Dr. Gregory Lukaszewicz, MD, (#3 Mountain Wood Lane, Hillsborough 94010) be subpoenaed to be a witness for the case to shed the light of truth (on the case). Dr. Lukaszewicz was used in this matter against his will and as a matter of fact, he has been kept a prisoner so that he is unable to have outside contact and freedom to tell his story.
Dr. Lukaszewicz, is listed as Plaintiff in the restraining order case against me, but he is as much a victim as myself. His honest testimony, without the Kaiser Attorney present, will end the entire case against me and save the Court’s time and money and can focus on the people who put us both through Hell for over 5 years with invalid restraining orders, using Dr. Lukaszewicz’s name and his forged signature and threats and duress to further comply, but when he did not comply once in court on the witness stand and told the truth, Mr. Guasco did not bring him back to court, but pretended on court filed documents that he had indeed been there. My adult son was present and wrote a statement saying no Plaintiff had ever been present. Dr. N. Nicole Moayeri, MD and the Kaiser contract attorney, Michael C. Guasco manufactured the entire matter against me, pretending Dr. Lukaszewicz was the true plaintiff, when he was not.
This entire matter was devised on behalf of a Dr. Moayeri, by attorney Michael C. Guasco, who is a contract attorney for Kaiser (NOT Dr. Lukaszewicz). Mr. Guasco devises very “creative”, cruel, illegal ways of ridding Kaiser of patients they find undesirable, such as severely handicapped, as the quadriplegic patient he framed as having spat at a nurse. The quadriplegic man, who was the client of John W. Busman in Orange County, CA. was exonerated. Mr. Guasco, also by using an illegally obtained TRO, harmed a father of a brain injured/traumatized young man, merely because the father was looking for justified answers for his son's treatment. Mike Guasco also frequently threatened the man (father), Jeff Lusk, often with jail, merely to be sadistic and keep the man in line (in fact, not once have I ever experienced an act of kindness coming from Mr. Guasco toward myself, only unprovoked cruelty). Mr. Guasco knew the man was the only caretaker of his son Tyler, so jail would be a disaster for him. There are more horrific parts to the story, when Mr. Lusk's home was invaded by men dressed as officers of the law and Mr. Lusk and his son were roughed up and his son's essential morphine was stolen.
I believe that I am being charitable by calling Mr. Guasco a monster.
Mr. Guasco uses Kaiser employees’ names as his Plaintiffs in his fabricated “legal” tales and then uses actors in court to complete the entire deception. One of Mr. Guasco's victims, Mr. Lusk, knew the employee (I have her name and work phone number) who was supposed to be the plaintiff against him and knew he was not looking at the person named in the invalid R.O. Mr. Guasco has a sordid plan going to assist Kaiser in keeping their 28 billion “kitty”and come off as their invaluable asset.
Mr. Guasco has used a very similar plan/template to put me under an invalid TRO and then R.O. I was unable to find an attorney for the first hearing and I became suspicious. I asked Mr. Guasco if he had anything to do with my inability to find an attorney, he just smiled. I was certain of it, since I called so many attorneys and often got strange responses. I even got an email response that said, “stop trying to get an attorney referral, no one is going to let you hire them. Leave the kind doctor alone!” It was obvious that someone warned them off, with lies.
Mr. Guasco's true client is Dr. Moayeri. She is an important surgeon to Kaiser and they want to do anything to make her happy. It has been Dr. Moayeri’s restraining order from the very start, not Dr. Lukaszewicz’s. She has hired two people to attack and threaten me using intimidation, torture and threat.
It isn’t even Dr. Lukaszewicz's style to do that kind of false legal thing. Dr. Moayeri and Dr. Lukaszewicz, I believe, had an agreement about investment and other entanglements of a personal nature, that he would know about, not myself. I suppose the time came up when those entanglements prevented him from feeling tied down any longer to Dr. Moayeri. Anyway, on the last day I saw him for an appointment, Dr. Lukaszewicz merely asked if I wanted to be his friend. I agreed. I suppose it did not settle well with Dr. Moayeri and did not want their past financial (etc) arrangement to end, so she contacted Mike Guasco, the contract attorney provided free by Kaiser for the complimentary use of their doctors to help her force Dr. Lukaszewicz to stay under her thumb. I believe he has been a controlled prisoner ever since.
The last day I saw Dr. Lukaszewicz alone, October 9, 2015, he asked me to be his friend. I said that would be nice. I dropped him as my doctor to begin the process. About 100 days later, I had chest pain and went to the ER. It was an infected gallbladder and I was told it had to be removed. I asked the ER doc if Dr. Lukaszewicz could observe. I never heard back. I waited for the surgery from Tuesday evening until Friday afternoon, when Dr. Lukaszewicz had a half day. My surgeon, Dr. David Le told me Dr. Lukaszewicz had been there to observe. I was also told by the floor/desk nurse that Dr. Lukaszewicz had been there to check on me while I was still asleep from the anestesia. He was making certain I was doing well and safe, not being angry with me.
About a week later, I was served with a TRO saying I had given Dr. Lukaszewicz unwanted gifts and made unwanted romantic overtures. None of which could have even been done except around 100 days, or more prior, which begs the question, why a TRO? They are for emergency protection, how was giving gifts that long ago an emergency? (The idea of my saying untoward things to Dr. Lukaszewicz was never an issue again, merely a ruse by Mr. Guasco to get the judge to sign the TRO) Neither of the reasons for the TRO were true. Dr. Lukaszewicz never returned any of the few gifts, and instead wrote me thank you notes and called me to say how much he liked what I had given him. It made no sense to be given a terrible, life altering TRO for things he liked and for behavior I never did, nor did he ever mention prior, or since. Nothing made any sense and for good reason. It was done as a desperate attempt to remove me from Dr. Lukaszewicz's life by Dr. Moayeri. I was given the phone number to a dummy message line for Dr. Lukaszewicz, by Patient Relations manager Bertha Ponse, so I could thank him for his kindness toward me. A week later I was served with a terrifying TRO.
Why would Dr. Lukaszewicz come to my surgery at MY request, to keep me safe, if he were going to give me a terrible, life altering TRO in a week, especially with a forgery of his signature on it? A forgery invalidates a restraining order. I also never believed the restraining order was valid, or actually given to me by Dr. Lukaszewicz. I thought perhaps it was all Kaiser’s doing, but why the need to forge Dr. Lukaszewicz’s signature?
Mr. Guasco was doing it for Dr. Moayeri, because she wanted to prevent Dr. Lukaszewicz from having freedom of movement and his own life, with his own friends. And with the help of Mr. Guasco, she has been able to accomplish just that.
Dr. Moayeri has twice hired people to attack me. One, her friend, Marija M. Petrovic, a psychiatrist from Serbia and a colleague, Dr. Moon in Radiology (Kaiser, Daly City) to diagnose me with false breast cancer, and a terrorizing breast biopsy session where she had Dr. Moon berate me and wave a long needle menacingly across my eyes and use threatening language. I had never met Dr. Moon before, but she called me selfish, that I always got everything I wanted and that I took away things that belonged to other people. It suddenly dawned on me that she was speaking for Dr. Moayeri, from her point of view. It was similar to when her psychiatrist friend (temp. Marija M. Petrovic) called me and said I embarrassed Dr. Lukaszewicz and he hated me, on and on, until I sobbed uncontrollably, then she abruptly hung up. She had obviously known I had a phone check-up appointment later that day with Dr. Lukaszewicz. I was still sobbing when he called and I apologized to him for embarrassing him, or causing him any problem. He barely spoke, but I must have worried him. He called everyone he knew I knew and had them call me, even Sgt. Steve Petit called me to ask when we were going to work on traffic problems together. The phone calls brought me out of the harmful attitude I had toward myself and saved my life. Dr. Lukaszewicz saved me. I asked Sgt. Petit if Dr. Lukaszewicz asked him to call me and he said, “that would be a violation of HIPPA to tell you.”
Dr. Lukaszewicz has always been there to keep me safe. I suppose it upset Dr. Moayeri that he did that and accepted and kept my gifts to him, so she put him between a “rock and a hard place” and had a Kaiser attorney threaten and force him to participate as much as he was told, but during court on the witness stand he said, “her gifts to me, were very nice and expensive.” That was after he said my name very gently and sweetly, which caused me to blush. At that point I thought the suffering would be over, but his testimony was ignored and I was given a sentence of 5 days in jail, serving 3.
This has been a plan by a desperate woman, Dr. Moayeri, to hold on to a partner and a willing attorney, Mike Guasco, who is obviously being paid by her as motivation to keep me restrained as long as he can (He said to me outside of court, “I can keep you restrained FOREVER!”
I saw the wall and buzzer door Mr. Guasco had installed around Dr. Lukaszewicz’s waiting area and a plethora of security cameras made to look as if they were protection for his office, but I contend it was all done to keep an eye on him, so that he cannot leave without someone knowing. I do not believe he is able to have freedom of movement. After he made a frightened phone call to me, but having had hung up quickly, I believe he has been restrained for a long time. I asked a local PD of his if I should ask for a welfare check on him. The officer said to me, “better to be safe than sorry”. He also said, “I know who lives there, a powerful woman.” He also said, “Men are not the only abusers; women can abuse too.” I agreed to the welfare check. Later on in court, attorney Mike Guasco belittled me for calling the police and said I was doing it to be a stalker through the police. I think only a twisted mind would come up with such a strange answer as that. Mr. Guasco, I was told, called off the extra patrolling the police agreed to of Dr. Lukaszewicz’s home at my request. I wanted to keep him safe, but obviously, Mr. Guasco did not.
That is still my primary goal. Dr. Lukaszewicz, through the years always kept me safe and was there for me at all times. Even new doctors I saw told me that he called them and told them how to treat me and keep me from anything painful, or embarrassing, since I have a condition that keeps me heavy and with very painful lumps.
Dr. Lukaszewicz needs to be compelled to come and be a witness for this case and be freed from the false imprisonment shackles of Mr. Guasco and Dr. Moayeri. It could serve to free me from past and the present invalid restraining order(s), restore my reputation and allow the focus to be on the real criminals, Dr. Moayeri and attorney Michael C. Guasco. Amongst the charges are false imprisonment, attempted murder, invalid restraining order, conspiracy, forgery, etc.
My so-called-attorney, Alejandro Jacome has been compromised by Attorney Mike Guasco. I have no control over his actions, he was forced upon me by the PDP, but he is as close to a hostile attorney as one can get. I am not certain I will get a fair trial with him. He does not want to present the forgery as evidence, nor does he want to use the invalid restraining order as evidence as to my innocence. He also did not want to have Dr. Lukaszewicz’s testimony exonerate me. He instead said he wanted to focus on the contempt charge. I contend that to be foolish, because there can be no contempt with an invalid restraining order, or if I never believed it to be valid, or from Dr. Lukaszewicz in the first place. I have never had contempt for the Court, but with all the lies and forgeries that Mike Guasco has filed with the Court, he has plenty of contempt and abuse of Court! He should be disbarred. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Cheryl Petrovich
P.O. Box 120 Gualala, CA 95445
Cc: Attorney Alejandro Jacome
No comments:
Post a Comment