Michael C. Guasco's Legal Abuse In My Case and Others!

Kaiser Law Firm of Buty & Curliano, especially Michael C. Guasco appear to use "unique" methods when it comes to legal procedure and abuse of court. (I do not feel that they expected me to be still alive after their brutal attacks on me and never thought I would be able to relate their abuse of me and of the court.) In my case they did the following (not in any particular order of occurrence):

1.) They used a Kaiser doctor's name to file a TRO against me that had no merit. My doctor was made to attend trials and hearings, until he completely refuted the entire basis for the TRO and subsequent restraining order, then they merely said in the court filed documents that he was there, when he was not (witness statement to that fact) and they had his signature forged. 

2.) In the extension trial, Mike Guasco used false evidence and said old emails were from 2017, when they were from 2015. He did not follow discovery rules: I never was given a copy.

3.) Buty & Curliano filed the TRO 97 days after I had last seen (had dropped) my doctor, but only around a week and a half after that doctor attended my surgery at my request. (Why would a doctor who wanted to have a restraining order against me attend my surgery because he made me feel safe?)

4.) They forged the doctor's signature in court filed documents. (Expert verified). One time, they faxed forged signature court documents from my doctor's alternate office when he was not present, to give it gravitas. (Clearly showed attempt at deception). As the expert said that a rehired Kaiser psychiatrist was the most likely forger, it showed how closely the psychiatrist and Mr. Guasco were working.

5.) Someone had former Kaiser psychiatrist, Marija M. Petrovic (from Serbia) rehired, to get me as her patient, so she could pile on false diagnoses into my chart to discredit me and achieve her goal of getting rid of me as my doctor's patient. (Verified by part of the involved party to the activities against me, with my witness hearing it and wrote a statement to that fact.) The psychiatrist only asked me about my doctor, yet in 4 office visits, she put into my chart 5 major mental illnesses. (I believe that they were insurance in case I were found dead by my own hand, or other means and those fake mental illnesses could be pointed to as the reason.)  She made extremely cruel, humiliating and hurtful phone calls to me and hung up when I began sobbing in earnest. She seemed to be purposely trying to get me upset enough to kill myself. That is not the normal behavior of psychiatrist, but I DO feel it could be called attempted murder.

6.) I was phoned and told by my doctor about a medical conference that had to do with my health issue of vascular insufficiency/lymphedema/lipidema
I attended the conference. When I arrived back home, the psychiatrist phoned me and called me a "STALKER." I fail to see how that moniker applied to me; I was at the conference to listen to a doctor who is the leading physician in that field and to learn more about the disease that had afflicted me after my year of harsh experimental chemo on a rare cancer. (It makes the body enlarge, especially the limbs, but can also affect many other areas of the body.) 

7.) Once I had an attorney, Mr. Donald Bloom (SF) who had contacted me and said he had heard I needed an attorney. He made it so affordable, I "couldn't refuse that offer." Yet, ultimately, I discovered Mr. Bloom was not helping me as much as he was helping Mr. Guasco. I spoke up in court despite Mr. Bloom and the judge's response was, "well in that case, this may very likely be a false restraining order!" Mr. Bloom dropped me and said that if I ever tried to reach him, he would give me a restraining order. (I could really use that $1,000 I gave him....)

8.) After Mr. Bloom, I was magically given an attorney I had previously attempted to hire, but who told me he did not handle my kind of case and who just met with me at court to return my file. He had yelled out for all to hear, in front of Mike Guasco and my doctor, "She is NOT my client, I am NOT her attorney!!" Next thing I knew, he was handing me a form to fill out for the Private Defender Program. (Later, I found out I was not in the program because it was not a criminal case, but Charles Smith, IV, pretended he was anyway.) He merely yelled at me to, "SHUT UP!" and kept me quiet as I was being railroaded.

9.) Mr. Guasco ended up with my court file at one point during my attempts at hiring an attorney, Mr. Marc Pelta (SF). Mr. Pelta was (I guess) trying to perfect his reason for why he no longer had my file. He said he shredded it. He said he shredded it mistakenly. He said he shredded it because it had sat too long in his office (2 weeks) and wanted to keep it safe. That last attempt is the one upon which he landed and stuck (like a teen Communist gymnast at the Olympics).  After I found it at Mr. Guasco's office (he said someone delivered it, but he did not know who and said it was in his safe) he never returned it to me. I called Mr. Pelta and he screamed at me and sounded close to tears and denied everything. Mr. Guasco certainly seems to stir up emotions....

10.) Mr. Guasco seems to have a great affinity for padding his court filings and delivering them as close to the court date as possible. He sent me false contempt charges that numbered 300 in pages, on a Thursday afternoon, for a Monday morning hearing! (I live, with traffic and hour of day, 5-6 hours away from the court!)
Three hundred pages sounds like a healthcare bill that no Congressperson read in its entirety! It was, no doubt, intended as visual mental attack on the recipient as well as for the judge's "pleasure." It is all just a part of Guasco's "shtick". (He must be a fan of prop comedy....)

11.) All THREE OF THE SAN MATEO COUNTY, CA SUPERIOR COURT JUDGES IN MY "CASE"  (Judge Livermore, Judge Novak, Judge Danny Chou) WOULD NOT GIVE ANY CREDENCE TO MY EVIDENCE! NOT EVEN ABOUT THE FORGERIES, OR THE STATEMENT BY THE INVOLVED SECURITY GUARD, EDWARD SOUZA (Kaiser South San Francisco security guard at the time, now with a better, permanent job at Kaiser, not with a contracting company any longer, the same as Emanuel de Guzman, who helped railroad me, he now works in "Communications" at Kaiser SSF) WHO SAID, (WITH MY WITNESS HEARING) THAT THE PSYCHIATRIST WAS REHIRED TO KAISER TO GET RID OF ME AS MY DOCTOR'S PATIENT! That should have been DAMNING EVIDENCE IN MY FAVOR! IT WAS ALL MANUFACTURED! WHY IS A FALSE RESTRAINING ORDER STILL IN EFFECT?

12.) TWICE, I was saddled with attorney, Charles Smith IV as a baby sitter, NOT an attorney! Had he been an attorney actually WORKING FOR ME, he would have quickly learned about the absolute FRAUDULENT nature of the case and would have ejected it into the universe and Guasco would have been disbarred and depending how far the case had gotten, most likely JAIL time too!

To be continued*******